Godzilla Review (minor spoilers)

Godzilla_2014_Design_Concept_2_-_Collider

Godzilla Review

In 2009, Legendary Pictures and Warner Bros announced that they acquired the rights to reboot Godzilla. As a huge Godzilla fan, I was jumping for joy and was excited for the 2012 release date. Legendary and Warner Bros pushed the release date back several times because they wanted to get the story right. So does this movie live up to the summer movie hype? Well no, it’s a disappointment. It’s not a big disappointment like the Amazing Spider-man 2. It is disappointing to see Godzilla not be star of his own movie. However,  Godzilla will entertain you  for 2 hours, and the ending is super satisfying.

There are three big negatives of Godzilla. The first negative is that Bryan Cranston’s character dies, and he sets up the story.  His death happens in the first 30 minutes of the film but he has about 15 to 20 minutes of screen time. I felt emotionally connected to his character.  Secondly, Aarron Taylor Johnson’s story is the dead weight of the movie.  I don’t think he’s a bad actor. The story telling and his acting were not up to par compared to Ken Watanable’s or Bryan Cranston’s acting. My final big thing was the lack of Godzilla. Godzilla only has about 20 minutes of screen time. I felt we needed more Godzilla because it’s his movie. The movie is not titled Godzilla and his humans but Godzilla. Godzilla in a sequel needs to have more focus and screen time.  . Warner Brothers has a online clip of Elizabeth Olsen’s character running from one of the monsters but she suddenly stops because Godzilla appears in front of her and he’s ready for a fight.  She finds shelter and then the camera pans on Godzilla, then we cut to Aaron Taylor Johnson and the soldiers.  The same editing issue appears during the entire fight sequence between Godzilla and the other monsters, and the humans take up Godzilla’s screen time with the emphasis on them instead of being on him and his fight, because they rarely cut back to the fighting between the monsters until the end.  I did miss Godzilla’s theme from Akira Ifukube. I wish they had played it at the end of the movie

Godzilla had many positives about it. The visuals, camera shots, and special effects were superb. The writing for exposition was great for describing special effects, and Edward’s had a vision on how to set the tone of the movie. The themes of the movie were excellent, too. They ranged from government cover ups to man controlling nature. The film makers had a clear cut vision on how make the movie.

Ken Watanable, David Strathairn, Bryan Cranston make the human story relevant to the audience. Cranston is gold in this movie. He brings a great amount of emotional depth to his character.  I felt sad and pissed when he died. Watanable plays Dr. Serizawa, and Serizawa isn’t an asshole like he is in the first Godzilla movie. Edwards and Max Borenstein, (the screenwriter) did a great job of reinventing the character. He sees Godzilla as nature’s way of restoring order. I want him back for the sequel. His character has more story to be told. Strathairn plays the perfect military antagonist. He’s is a villain in the movie. He’s a scary villain because he thinks his way is right. He would rather nuke radioactive monsters than listen to his leading scientist, Dr. Serizawa. He reluctantly concedes to Serizawa’s opinion of letting Godzilla take care of the other monsters.

Finally, Godzilla is done right. Yes, Godzilla only has 20 minutes of screen time. He should have about 20 more because it’s his movie.  Godzilla is more of an emotional anti-hero in the movie. The producers, studios, director, and the writers made Godzilla right. He’s not a wimp that runs away from a fight like in the other American version.  He’s a little too fat and his belly jiggles when he stomps around. He  might have been eating too many big macs.  Godzilla is a bad ass when he gets his screen time. The fight scenes with the monster were done so perfectly. The last 20 minutes makes this movie worth watching again. The Mutos were intelligent monsters. They legitimately challenged Godzilla which is hard to do for any monster.  I felt emotionally connected to the other monsters and Godzilla. You will jump for joy at the other monster references from the Godzilla universe.

Overall Godzilla wasn’t the fantastical spectacle that I hoped it would be. It was a fun movie, kind of disappointing, but go see it. Despite its flaws there is something so satisfying about the ending that made people stand and cheer, even though Godzilla isn’t the main focus like he should and the humans are. The creators of the film got Godzilla so right;. It’s visually fantastic; the themes are similar to the 1954 Godzilla; and Godzilla is anti-hero. It was so satisfying to see Godzilla on the big screen kicking mother fucking ass (yea I said it). Godzilla gets a 3/5.

A three out of five movie isn’t a bad rating. It’s a three star movie. I encourage anybody who read this review to go see Godzilla.  I have several friends who are passionate Godzilla fans and deeply appreciates him as a pop fiction icon. They loved this movie.  I am happy to be in minority opinion about how good this Godzilla really is. Studios do listen to dissenting opinions because they want to make the best movie possible for everybody.  I hope Legendary Studios and Warner Bros do listen to critics and a few fans who let down by this Godzilla movie like me.   I still had fun and I loved seeing my childhood idol take back the big screen. Go see Godzilla and decide for yourself.

Godzilla, what did you think? Comment below and let me know.  We need Mothra in the sequel…so make it happen Godzilla fans. Take to social media and let them know we want Mothra.

 

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Godzilla Review (minor spoilers)

  1. I liked the treatment Godzilla got. Sure, he was only in 20 mins of screen time. But that’s why it works. Thats a big reason why previous installments sucked. Too much monster. Plus, this sets up the tease and it works. Not only that, but it is being told from the human perspective. And sometimes, the humans aren’t present for whatever Godzilla is doing the rest of the time. Edwards wanted it to be that when you see Godzilla, you are seeing him through the eyes of the human characters. You see what they see. And to that, I give Edwards credit because he nailed it.

    • I disagree because the Aarron Taylor Johnson was so flat. I didn’t like him but film is subject. Edwards did cut away from Godzilla trying to fight these monster so many times to focus on the human element. People come there to see Godzilla and not his humans. Toho movies were usually 90 minutes plus but the best Godzilla movie was Godzilla vs. Biollante. It had two main human characters in it. Godzilla is in the film about an hour in a 2 1/2 movie. The scientists use Godzilla cells to create a mutated plant and anti-nuclear bacteria to stop Godzilla.

      I don’t think Edwards nailed. He needs some more work with editing but the ending was so satisfying that it will cause me to go see it again.

      • Yeah I just disagree with you. I agree that Kick-Ass was wooden, acting-wise. But the build up and how often or not often we saw Godzilla was a good ratio in my opinion. Look at some of the good “monster” movies. Super 8: you dont see the monster till the last half hour. Jaws: you only see the shark a couple times. It works. Sometimes you need to set fanboy emotions aside and look at it from an outside perspective. The movie as a whole, not just what you wish it was.

      • See, I’m not saying this as a fanboy through. Jaws comparison is unfair because we don’t want to see the shark. It terrorizes the town and eats people. Everybody in the world knows what Godzilla looks like. We want to see him do his thing. People go see Godzilla movies for Godzilla. They only needed to add about 10 to 15 minutes of screen time with him. The fight on Hawaii would have been perfect gives us a 2 to 3 minutes fight and tease the audience. The muto flies away and we as the audience laugh at and call it a wimp. A fanboy would doesn’t have a critical eye would have not rated this movie a 3/5.

        My orginial rating was a 4 because of the fanboy in me…then my mom edited it. She looked at me and goes does this movie deserve a 4 out of 5. I said no a 3.5. However she reminded me to put to my bias aside and truly rate the movie so it’s a 3. I know you disagree Tim. I’m glad you enjoyed it.

  2. Pingback: Top 6 major new stories in the last week | coop on the scoop

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s